By Katie Merritt, Senior Research and Data Manager, Robert Half
The future of an industry doesn’t always announce itself with breakthrough technology, a major acquisition or headline-making innovation.
Sometimes it shows up in the decisions organizations make about their people.
Which skills are worth paying more for? What are employers willing to change? What do employees expect in return?
The answers can tell us a lot about how workforce priorities are changing.
According to the 2027 Salary Guide From Robert Half, employers across business and professional services, manufacturing, healthcare, financial services, consumer products, technology and government are facing very different workforce challenges.
The same workforce trend can mean something very different depending on the industry. That helps explain why employers across these industries are responding differently to what their workers value.
Take a look at the industries hiring right now and jobs expected to be in demand.
Insight into 2027 hiring trends and pay aross sectors
Professional services employers paying more for specialized technology skills
Business and professional services firms depend on what their people know.
Law firms, tax practices and scientific and technical organizations need professionals who can apply specialized knowledge to client problems. Technology skills become more valuable when paired with deeper subject-matter expertise.
That helps explain why 79% of employers in this industry pay more for candidates with specialized technology or software skills than for otherwise-qualified candidates without them.
Knowing how to use a tool is one thing. Applying it to complex client work takes experience, and that experience can make an employee more valuable.
Nearly two-thirds of professionals in this sector, or 64%, say financial incentives could motivate them to consider changing employers if the starting salary were the same. As employees build their expertise, other firms may become more interested in recruiting them.
The most important financial incentives to these workers are 401(k) savings plans with matching programs, performance-based bonuses, annual raises, pre-tax health program matching, signing bonuses and financial wellness programs.
When knowledge is what clients are buying, losing an experienced employee with specialized skills can affect the work a firm is able to take on. Keeping that expertise helps protect the capabilities that make the firm valuable to its clients.
Manufacturing employers finding new ways to offer workplace flexibility
Flexibility is harder to offer in manufacturing. Production lines need people on-site. Equipment needs operators. One person’s absence can affect the work waiting for someone else.
Employees understand this. They also want more control over how work fits into the rest of their lives.
Among manufacturing professionals, 67% say work-life balance and remote-work benefits could motivate them to change employers if the starting salary were the same.
For many workers, flexibility will never mean working from home most of the week. It may mean having more say over a shift or knowing a schedule further in advance. For employees in jobs that do not require them on-site every day, even one remote day could make the week easier to manage.
That willingness to adapt is showing up in compensation, too. 58% of manufacturing employers report hiring someone above their original compensation budget to secure top talent.
Manufacturing employers are showing some willingness to adjust pay when a candidate has the skills they need. They may need to bring that same thinking to flexibility.
Even small changes could make a difference for manufacturing employees who have traditionally had fewer options.
Healthcare employers have room to do more for employee well-being
Healthcare professionals spend their careers caring for other people.
The work can be physically demanding and emotionally difficult, especially when a team is short-staffed.
Workers are paying attention to how employers support them in return.
These employers are typically known to offer premium healthcare options compared to other industries, demonstrated by above average rates for parental leave, pre-tax health programs and vision coverage. However, the gap for wellness programs and mental health coverage aren’t as pronounced as the other traditional areas, calling out an opportunity for healthcare employers.
Among healthcare professionals, 58% say health and wellness-related rewards could motivate them to consider changing employers if the starting salary were the same. Even more, 66%, say work-life balance and remote-work benefits could influence the same decision.
Healthcare organizations are offering more ways to seek support. Nearly half (49%) provide in-person mental health support and counseling benefits, while 67% offer digital mental health platforms.
But healthcare workers also know when support exists mainly on paper. A mental health benefit has greater value when employees have the time and freedom to use it.
That matters in an industry where the work doesn't stop simply because someone is tired, stressed or struggling.
The benefits an organization offers are only part of the message. Employees also see whether the way work gets done allows them to use that support when they need it.
Financial services employers paying more for specialized skills
Financial services employers tend to make careful decisions about risk and cost. That's what makes these findings interesting.
According to Robert Half research, 65% of financial services employers say their compensation offers are more competitive than they were 3 years ago. Nearly as many (63%) have hired someone above their original compensation budget to secure top talent.
Financial services employers are already known for paying above market rates compared to other industries, so while the volume of new hires may have dropped in the past year, they are still paying attention to the cost benefit analysis of missing out on the right hire.
Financial acumen alone isn't always enough. Employers want people who understand the business and can use emerging technologies without losing sight of risk. Employees need to recognize when information does not look right, know which questions to ask and understand the business context around a decision. As such, 49% of financial services countries report paying premiums for AI skills above and beyond what they’re already offering for critical technical skills.
A hiring manager may find candidates who know the technology or understand the business. Finding someone who brings both can change the compensation conversation.
That combination can be hard to find. Financial services employers appear increasingly willing to pay more when they find it.
Consumer products employers looking for new ways to improve employee retention
Consumer products employers have one of the clearest gaps between what workers value and what many organizations offer.
Fewer than half of the employers surveyed provide performance-based bonuses or annual raises. Yet workers continue to place significant value on financial incentives beyond starting salary.
That can make an offer feel limited even when the base pay is acceptable. People do not stop thinking about compensation once they accept a job. They want to know what happens after the first year.
Will strong performance lead to a raise? Can they earn more without having to leave? Is there a path to something better if they stay?
If those answers are unclear, an employer is asking people to make a longer-term commitment without showing them what that commitment can lead to.
Better benefits may help. So could more flexibility or a real opportunity to advance. But a longer list of minor perks is unlikely to change how someone feels about a job that offers little financial or professional growth.
A competitive salary may get someone in the door. Employees are also deciding whether tomorrow looks any different if they stay.
Technology employers using pay transparency to address pay equity
Technology companies spent years competing intensely for people with hard-to-find skills.
Candidates entered at different times and under different market conditions. Employers made offers based on what it took to hire someone at that moment. Over time, people doing similar work could end up making very different amounts.
Pay transparency brings those differences into view.
According to our research, 74% of technology employers say greater transparency improved employee trust and morale, and 67% say it improved internal pay equity. Another 74% report higher-quality candidate pools.
Reaching those outcomes can require difficult decisions. Publishing a salary range is the visible part. Employers then have to look at what people are already earning and decide whether those differences can be justified.
When they cannot, correcting them may require raising someone’s pay simply because it should have been higher in the first place.
That requires an organization to take a hard look at how past hiring decisions affected what employees are paid today.
Employees see the difference between sharing information and acting on it. Transparency can build trust when people believe the organization will address what the information reveals.
For technology employers, publishing salary ranges can lead to bigger questions about whether people doing similar work are being paid fairly.
Government employers showing more flexibility on pay
Government jobs are often associated with fixed salary ranges, established hiring processes and little room to negotiate.
Yet 61% of government employers report hiring someone at a salary above their original budget during the past year.
That matters because candidates may assume that a posted range, established budget or initial offer leaves little room for discussion. Even within those constraints, employers sometimes adjust.
Government employers award skill premiums at rates similar to other industries. They are less likely, however, to offer more specifically for AI proficiency.
Many government organizations continue to value people who know how to do the work and understand the setting in which it gets done. New technology can support employees, but experience still carries weight.
Government organizations also compete with private employers for skilled professionals. When someone has the experience an organization needs and may be difficult to replace, even a traditionally structured employer may reconsider what it is willing to pay.
Candidates may have more room to discuss compensation than they expect, even in a government hiring process.
What industry hiring trends reveal about recruiting and retention
Employees don't experience workforce trends as statistics. They experience them when they're deciding whether to stay, whether to leave and whether another opportunity is worth pursuing.
The findings in this research point to a simple reality. Employees aren't all looking for the same thing and employers aren’t all offering the same thing.
What matters to employees can look very different from one industry to another. The employers that understand those differences are in a better position to attract the people they need and give them a reason to stay.
Follow Katie Merritt on LinkedIn.
Hire talent
Find a job
Whether you are looking to build your team or make the next move in your career, Robert Half can help. Contact us to discuss your hiring needs and learn how our experienced recruiters can help you find the right talent. Let our experts guide you as you grow your career.
